×
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
×
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
The College view on prostate cancer screening
Improving prostate cancer outcomes without triggering a wave of overdiagnosis requires a nuanced approach
With prostate cancer being one of the most common cancers affecting men globally, there is need for a multi-pronged approach to tackling a disease that affects 63,000+ men in the UK alone per year. The ethnic differences in prostate cancer mortality and morbidity are a concern. Black men face a higher rate of diagnosis and high grade disease (which means a tumour is likely to grow and spread faster).
Improving prostate cancer outcomes without triggering a wave of overdiagnosis requires a nuanced approach. The College supports the introduction, in the future, of smarter screening of high risk groups, better biopsy strategies, and AI-augmented diagnosis. These need to be implemented with care. Pathologists are vital for almost every aspect of patient care, from diagnostic testing and treatment advice to using cutting-edge genetic technologies and guiding risk-stratified management. Their workload must be respected and supported with staffing, technology, and training.
To truly improve men’s health without fuelling overdiagnosis we recommend:
- Focus screening efforts on high-risk groups, such as black men, those with BRCA1/2 mutations and those with a family history of the disease, rather than blanket screening.
- Implement MRI diagnostic pathways, ensuring biopsies are only taken when imaging suggests clinically significant disease.
- Invest in training and retaining histopathologists and expand the use of digital pathology to reduce bottlenecks.
- Use pathology data to refine prognostic models, incorporating histological, molecular, and imaging features to personalise treatment.
- Promote active surveillance for low-risk disease, relying on clear criteria and regular monitoring rather than immediate treatment.
- Encourage trials such as TRANSFORM to examine the utility of these newer techniques rather than blanket adoption.
Download our full position statement and briefing here: